Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2025 at 06:44:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Others
Info created and uploaded by TheGoodEndedHappily – nominated by Ciell -- Ciell (talk) 06:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ciell (talk) 06:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2025 at 06:24:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train_stations
Info created and uploaded by TheGoodEndedHappily – nominated by Ciell -- Ciell (talk) 06:24, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ciell (talk) 06:24, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2025 at 05:14:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2025 at 21:35:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by NASA and ESA – uploaded by Stas1995 – nominated by Kasir -- Kasir (talk) 21:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kasir (talk) 21:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2025 at 15:05:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info View of the Lorelei in the evening light from the opposite bank of the Rhine -- Milseburg (talk) 15:05, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:05, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:08, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2025 at 11:40:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Groups
Info created by Vasily Surikov – uploaded by Dcoetzee – nominated by Mahan -- Mahan (talk) 11:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mahan (talk) 11:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support A bit on the small side for a painting digitisation but still very interesting and great artwork Cmao20 (talk) 14:06, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2025 at 11:27:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Hesse
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:27, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:27, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Pleasant light and colours Cmao20 (talk) 14:05, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2025 at 11:25:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Hesse
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:25, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:25, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:33, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2025 at 04:49:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 04:49, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 04:49, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice use of ghosting as an artistic technique Cmao20 (talk) 14:03, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Great sharpness at a high f-number and long exposure. JayCubby (talk) 20:42, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support The contrast between the sharpness of the distant lights and the blurred pedestrians is interesting. Acroterion (talk) 00:17, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 21:45:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Bones_and_fossils#Family_:_Asaphidae
Info Isotelus was a genus of trilobite from the Ordovician that is commonly found in central and western North America (to the point that it's the state fossil of Ohio). It produced the largest trilobites known to science; this cast measures over 70 centimetres (28 in) in length. A scale has been provided, based on image number 2 at the museum's website. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:45, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:45, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 07:17, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool fossil Cmao20 (talk) 14:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support A well-preserved body of an animal that lived long ago. Wolverine X-eye 17:38, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 19:29:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculpture_outdoors
Info The bronze sculpture "Sfera grande" (Large sphere), depicted here, is a subject out of ordinary, a perfect figure, energy emanating from a form. It may symbolize the complexity of planet Earth or a world breaking apart to reveal its interior, but it also represents a metaphor for the human mind, highlighted in its inner workings: Many people wear a mask in their daily lives, which sooner or later is destined to show itself, revealing the complex workings of our being and our human vulnerability. This was the belief of its creator, one of the leading exponents of contemporary Italian sculpture, Arnaldo Pomodoro (1926–2025). Noteː According to the italian WLM WebApp this monument is part of the WLM contest overcoming the Freedom of Panorama issue in Italy. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:29, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:29, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:46, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 04:54, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:39, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support (There is a small dust spot at the right border) --imehling (talk) 07:18, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- I removed some spots from the sky, including the one you pointed out, thank you very much. Terragio67 (talk) 17:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:36, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:19, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 19:15:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Le Commissaire – uploaded by Le Commissaire – nominated by Le Commissaire (talk) 19:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Le Commissaire (talk) 19:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I'm not seeing any big wow factor here. It's just a normal portrait.--Peulle (talk) 08:51, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment It's a nice portrait but a little noisy and I'm not sure it has a huge wow factor, agree. I'd probably need something more unusual in light, atmosphere, angle, composition etc. to support Cmao20 (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 17:28:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by Victor Jorgensen, restored and uploaded by JayCubby, nominated by Yann
Info U.S. Navy photojournalist Victor Jorgensen captured another view of V-J Day in Times Square taken by Alfred Eisenstaedt that was published in The New York Times the following day. Eisenstaedt's picture is still under a copyright, while Jorgensen's is in the public domain.
Support -- Yann (talk) 17:28, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support and thanks for the nom. JayCubby (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 15:29:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
Info St. Jude's Church on the south west coast of India was built on sandy soil in 1964. It serves a fishing village. Note: only 1 FP of the exterior of a church in India. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:29, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 15:29, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Not sure the bird is helping. Between the distraction and the darker area around it (almost like smudging), it feels like losing it would help greatly. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492:
Done Cloned it out, thanks for the suggestion. --Tagooty (talk) 03:05, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492:
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:06, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 07:19, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks! Happy to support now. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:48, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It's a good image. But there are too many distractions on the ground around it for me. --MB-one (talk) 18:52, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- @MB-one: Thanks for the review. I've cloned out the main distractions. Please review the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:36, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 12:01:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info: the cupola of the Esders and Scheefhals building, Saint Petersburg; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:01, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:01, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:06, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 04:55, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 11:24:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info All by me. Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:24, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:24, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:05, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 10:24, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A routine image of a dilapidated building. Lacking wow-factor. --Tagooty (talk) 16:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 07:59:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Hautes-Alpes
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 07:59, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive panoramic view from the top of Mont Pelat, French Alps. The landscape transforms from pasture to forest and finally to rough lunar terrain. —kallerna (talk) 07:59, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:05, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:04, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Amazing Cmao20 (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:44, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Good job --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per above comments... --Terragio67 (talk) 21:21, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:52, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:45, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:36, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 07:47:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Japan
Info created by MaedaAkihiko – uploaded by MaedaAkihiko – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 07:47, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 07:47, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support It almost feels, as if the trains are jumping at me. --MB-one (talk) 18:11, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support The shadow of the wires on the right train is a shame, but it's an impressive view Cmao20 (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 05:38:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species_:_Panthera_tigris_(Tigers)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Unclean pp at the top left. Fixable?--Ermell (talk) 06:02, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- I have cropped some part and tried to fix the rest, is this any better? Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:52, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice. And I don't mind the blurry plants, the picture is taken in the wild and it is very sharp Cmao20 (talk) 19:01, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks good now. --Ermell (talk) 19:37, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- JayCubby (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Purposeful stride, colours blend nicely. --Tagooty (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:20, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Good images of tigers outside zoos are rare, especially in motion. Acroterion (talk) 00:13, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 03:37:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
Info all by me. heylenny (talk/edits) 03:37, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 03:37, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but just not an interesting view of this building - mainly quite a dull wall, and the window at the bottom is cropped arbitrarily. Image quality is fine but no FP composition. Cmao20 (talk) 19:00, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- I think the colors of the building and the sky (orange and blue), as they are complementary colors, are visually interesting. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:45, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Weather is good, but light and composition, unappealing -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2025 at 03:36:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#United States
Info created by Tony Webster – uploaded by Domzalee – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 03:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 03:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very high resolution, good quality, nice colours and reflection. I would be tempted to crop some sky so that the image is more vertically symmetrical, but not essential. Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 04:55, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:57, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2025 at 22:52:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Charadrius
Info Semipalmated plover (Charadrius semipalmatus). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 22:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Simple yet effective. Wolverine X-eye 04:05, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Ermell (talk) 06:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:06, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support The scientific name in the file name or at least in the file description would be useful --Llez (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent Cmao20 (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 21:28, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:30, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:36, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:22, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:55, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2025 at 22:44:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Switzerland
Info The oldest covered wooden bridge in Europe. Extremely high resolution, high quality, and a peaceful, pleasant mood. One existing FP of this bridge, IMO light, mood, and angle is different enough that both can be FP. created by Roy Egloff – uploaded by Roy Egloff – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:44, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:44, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 08:40, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:08, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:41, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:39, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 21:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 04:55, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Absolutely stunning and wonderful, but I stumbled over a stitching error (see image note). Roy Egloff, could you have a look? – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose for now, sorry.
Support now, see below. – Aristeas (talk) 13:27, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Wonderful picture; the stitching error is minor for me.--Tournasol7 (talk) 12:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- Agree that I personally think this is a minor error. I was worried at first that I had been hasty in my nomination, but it's a slight misalignment of a single frame visible only when zoomed in to near full size in a huge 151 megapixel image. So I will keep this nomination open as I think it should become FP whether or not the error is corrected. Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- As a courtesy to Roy Egloff and to this wonderful photo, I have repaired the stitching error (and BTW some dust spots). I have uploaded the new version over the original, because the changes affect only relatively small parts of the image and Roy is not regularly active here, so will not see this discussion in time. I hope this is OK for you, Roy, and to you, Cmao20, as the nominator (and to everybody else). – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, it's fine by me. Thanks for the effort! Cmao20 (talk) 14:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Great capture! Many thanks to Aristeas for the improvement. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:10, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2025 at 21:26:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans and toucanets)
Info One FP of the same bird facing the other way. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Better than the existing FP in my opinion Cmao20 (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Another excellent bird image. Wolverine X-eye 04:04, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:40, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 21:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2025 at 19:37:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittacidae_(True_Parrots)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:37, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:37, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:00, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent! Cmao20 (talk) 22:49, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support That's a very good shot. Wolverine X-eye 04:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:33, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:34, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent detail, striking composition. --Tagooty (talk) 15:32, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:17, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- JayCubby (talk) 13:13, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Almost too good to be true ;–). Wonderful colours, good detail, harmonious soft background. – Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas --MB-one (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Fantastic capture of colorful birds frozen in flight -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2025 at 18:04:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info Buffalo Bill, Sitting Bull, Black Elk and the italian journalist and writer Diego Angeli at the "Antico Caffè Greco" (still existing) in Rome, Italy, on 24 February 1890, during the italian tour of the Wild West Show. --- A quite famous photo here in Rome, can be found on various italian blogs and facebook pages. I think I managed to find the highest quality image. It is indeed funny to see two indian chiefs in a so chic situation, so I thought it could be a good FP candidate (even thought I don't know if it is more an historical event or a simple historical portrait). /// Photographed probably by Diego Angeli himself (visible in the photo, at the center) – uploaded by LucaLindholm – nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 18:04, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 18:04, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Shame it’s so small, but it’s also completely irreplaceable so I guess it should be FP Cmao20 (talk) 22:49, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 yup, here in Italy we haven't had in the past much cure for photographical archives (there isn't a big national one yet, lol) and for the preservation of the photos theirselves and all the private and even public archives here are not willing to collaborate with Commons and, what's worst, everyone is even trying to speculate on already PD images, profiting from the ignorance of the common people... here in Italy the politicans are trying to get the past forgotten, rather than remembered.
- Maybe we could obtain an even slightly better quality for this photo in particular by directly scanning it from the original book... but that will take some time.
- I'll see in the future if I can do it... LucaLindholm (talk) 09:57, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Historically significant image.--Peulle (talk) 08:56, 16 September 2025 (UTC)- Yes, historically significant, but the focus is wrong. Yann (talk) 18:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2025 at 17:50:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Picidae_(Woodpeckers)
Info Northern yellow-shafted flicker (Colaptes auratus luteus) male. a little soft, but I think the pose/comp makes up for it. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 17:50, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:50, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:01, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:48, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely image of a lovely bird. Wolverine X-eye 04:01, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:33, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- JayCubby (talk) 13:13, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2025 at 16:08:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Lower_Saxony
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 16:08, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 16:08, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Tranquil mood and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 22:47, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:08, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:45, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:20, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Good light, colours, composition. – Aristeas (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Female humpback whale diving
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2025 at 08:45:00 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Balaenopteridae (Rorquals)
Info The name humpback derives from the way the whale arches its back before diving. These five images are part of a burst of 27 images taken at 12 frames/second. I decided to choose five images, but naturally there are hundreds of alternative set combinations that I could have nominated. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment -- I thought only one picture is allowed, and alternative images need to be closely related Kingsacrificer (talk) 10:38, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I think that the set furthers our educational mission more than any individual image would. A video would probably do so even better, mind, but it is useful having the "hump" frozen in time for readers to see. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:02, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Definitely an acceptable set to me, the images in the set are definitely closely related and they together illustrate an event happening over time. FP rules describe ‘ A sequence of images showing the passage of time.’ as one main justification for a set. Cmao20 (talk) 22:47, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support This is a unique set. Wolverine X-eye 04:00, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Kingsacrificer (talk) 10:00, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:08, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:18, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Chris and Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:58, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2025 at 07:44:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Others
Info created by Dunpharlain – uploaded by Dunpharlain – nominated by Mitar -- Mitar (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mitar (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive shot--MB-one (talk) 12:18, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:08, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice photo but not outstanding image quality in my opinion. It's fine, but we have so many sharper, less noisy, and higher resolution macro photos... Cmao20 (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- With two bites at the same time? Mitar (talk) 19:28, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Stunning photo which would make an impressive opening image for a journal, a blog, etc. The lateral light and the limited DoF give it a cinematic effect and make the two animals appear dangerous and vicious. Therefore I would not compare this photo with our usual documentary FPs of animals, it has its own character and merits. – Aristeas (talk) 17:50, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:57, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 21:11:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info 70 Temperance Street in Toronto is not a particularly famous building; it is shorter than many of its neighbours and sited on a minor side road. That being said, it catches your eye when you are looking southward from City Hall, with a series of three central windows that are framed by rows and rows of balconies. This image shows a detail of one such window, with the reflections of the clouds framed by the structure, lost in a sea of balconies. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very striking photo, good quality Cmao20 (talk) 00:37, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very cool composition. Wolverine X-eye 06:12, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:22, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:34, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 21:35, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:44, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:06, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 19:26:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Coraciidae_(Rollers)
Info Coracias garrulus in Hungary. Сreated by Andy Morffew – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 19:26, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:26, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support This one is great. Although, one should probably make sure to get the full Latin species name into the image description, when I looked at it, it just read 'Rollers - Hungary' which isn't really enough Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent shot. Wolverine X-eye 06:13, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Extremely pretty Kingsacrificer (talk) 10:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:34, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:26, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:37, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:34, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- JayCubby (talk) 13:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:43, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 19:20:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
Info Merops apiaster (bee-eaters) in Hungary. Сreated by Andy Morffew – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 19:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:34, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Mr Morffew is clearly a great photographer, and there are so many FP quality photos amongst his works. I thank him for releasing them on Flickr under a Creative Commons license. That said, the editing in this one is a little clumsy. It seems that the background has been artificially blurred, and although there is nothing wrong with that, the transition between sharp subject and blurred background is quite abrupt, with the tail of the bottom bird having cut-out edges in ways that don't look natural, or indeed entirely accurate. Additionally, I count nine existing FPs of this species in the category, including one by the same author. Hence I personally don't think this one should also be featured, as it does not match up to existing FPs. Cmao20 (talk) 00:34, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 17:53:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of South America
Info created by Burr, David H.S. – uploaded by Keysanger – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 17:53, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 17:53, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unconvinced that this is an FP quality map. Not that large for a static object that can easily be scanned and reproduced (8.2 megapixels) and the text does not seem entirely sharp at full size. Also, no particular indication of historical importance provided, it's a nice old map but I'm not sure 'nice old map' is enough for something to be FP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmao20 (talk • contribs)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 17:40:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1910-1919
Info created by Harry Whittier Frees – uploaded + restored by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 17:40, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support and there are many more by the creator I might nominate -- JayCubby (talk) 17:40, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:49, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 18:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 18:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Possibly one of the most important images I've seen for a while. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Just precious Cmao20 (talk) 00:26, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Two little kitties riding a mini-train, can you get any cuter than that? Wolverine X-eye 06:16, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- Three would be really cute. JayCubby (talk) 18:43, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:39, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:33, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 21:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cute. – Aristeas (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 17:20:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info The interior of the Basilica of Sarsina is solemn yet frugal and austere, with little light filtering in: the ceiling is trussed and the floor plan is a Latin cross. Instead, a valuable 12th-century pulpit, in Franco-German style, is visible and well-lit. It depicts the symbols of the four evangelists: the angel of St. Matthew, the lion of St. Mark, the eagle of St. John, and the calf of St. Luke. Then, at the foot of the altar, a marble bas-relief with a gabled pediment, dating back to the 10th century, executed on a 7th-century carved marble. It depicts Christ enthroned, with St. Gabriel with a winnowing fan on his left and St. Michael trampling the devil on his right. The crucifix, which integrates well into the upper part of the apse, was made in 1400 by an unknown artist. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful church. Thumbnail does not do it justice; I strongly recommend reviewers not pass this one up. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:03, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Chris; the warm colors create a very inviting atmosphere. Great work in certainly difficult lighting conditions! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely photo and a really interesting image description too! Cmao20 (talk) 00:26, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support A spectacular image that is worth a stop for those passing by. Wolverine X-eye 06:17, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:18, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:09, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very impressive if viewed in full-screen view, solemn mood. – Aristeas (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 12:30:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Primates#Genus : Macaca (Macaques)
Info The Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta), colloquially Rhesus monkey, is a species of Old World monkey.
All by Shagil Muzhappilangad -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak support The ISO/NR is high, sadly. JayCubby (talk) 17:43, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes sure it's a bit noisy but it's a high resolution file that is taken in the wild, so it's pretty great for me, lovely composition. The categories did need a bit of work though. At the bare minimum you need to specify the country it's been taken, 'Category:Macaca mulatta' wasn't enough. I also added a category for a juvenile, because that's, I assume, what we're seeing here. Cmao20 (talk) 00:25, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you dear. Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 01:50, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Composition okay but low quality. Not even a COM:QI in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Basile Morin. Note: Andhra Pradesh is a large state, useful to add a more precise location. --Tagooty (talk) 16:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- Location added. Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 17:46, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Spondylus gaederopus
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 12:44:16 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Spondylidae
Info In the members of the genus Spondylus (the "spiny oysters") the right valve is attached on a substrate (rocks, corals, etc). The region of the attachement is well visible on the valve. It is typical of Spondylus gaederopus, the European Thorny Oyster, that the right valve is completely white, whereas the left one is purple outside; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 13:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:10, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:42, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:25, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Always good to see your shells Cmao20 (talk) 00:20, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:38, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:35, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:19, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Meticulous composition and high quality --Tagooty (talk) 16:08, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:39, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 12:21:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family : Sapindaceae
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 12:21, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Plozessor (talk) 12:21, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MB-one (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support An impressive pair of trees and a straightforward but effective composition Cmao20 (talk) 00:20, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:09, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:26, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- -donald- (talk) 04:36, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:33, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:05, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 09:25:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
Info created , uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 09:25, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 09:25, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 09:51, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:08, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Just absolutely exquisite Cmao20 (talk) 00:19, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:27, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:33, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:38, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 08:57:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:57, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:57, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow what a funny bird, it looks more like a porcupine! Great photo and nice pastel colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:17, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support an excellent image. I believe this is an adult female and if so, this should be included in the image description. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- I have included it in the description, thank you. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:30, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:40, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:16, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:33, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting patterning! -- JayCubby (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful bird, good pose, very good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2025 at 08:43:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:43, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:43, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 09:50, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking and impressive. I suppose you could argue some parts of the water might benefit from denoising but it's probably not worth the effort Cmao20 (talk) 00:16, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:59, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Loving the triangular-shaped wave forming behind the boat. Wolverine X-eye 06:22, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:04, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:40, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:33, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:21, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:44, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2025 at 21:32:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Dicruridae_(Drongos)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 22:01, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely drongo. Wolverine X-eye 05:10, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:10, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:12, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:05, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Valuable composition. --Terragio67 (talk) 17:30, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:16, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:20, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:44, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2025 at 18:51:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United Kingdom#Scotland
Info created by TheBritinator – uploaded by TheBritinator – nominated by TheBritinator -- TheBritinator (talk) 18:51, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- TheBritinator (talk) 18:51, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive rock. It reminds me of The Shooting Star. Yann (talk) 19:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 22:02, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice. Wolverine X-eye 05:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:10, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 09:31, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:05, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:33, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very lovely composition and colours, excellent quality. Not sure if you're new here, but if so, welcome to FPC, what a good way to start. Cmao20 (talk) 00:13, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:40, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:20, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2025 at 16:01:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
Info The new Audi Concept C moments after its presentation at IAA Mobility in Munich. I had less than three seconds to get this shot before the room filled with people (for reference see File:Audi Concept C, IAA Open Space 2025, Munich (20250909-P1050348).jpg) all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- MB-one (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:22, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:07, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Stylish! Wolverine X-eye 20:15, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 22:02, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:21, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support The photo is very good. But I don't like the car's design.--Milseburg (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:21, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice shotǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 17:35, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Extremely ugly car but I can't deny the photograph is very high quality and depicts the subject in a way that's in keeping with the style. Cmao20 (talk) 00:12, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. Terrible car design, typical for the arrogant attitude of Audi and Audi fans. But congrats to getting this shot in only 3 seconds! – Aristeas (talk) 13:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Could be an official product image --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:57, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2025 at 13:38:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos
Info No FPs of this place. created by Basile Morin – uploaded by Basile Morin – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:58, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Symmetrical composition, warm lighting, impressive details, and serene atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:20, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Gorgeous. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support A few cm futher to the left would have been perfect, but still FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:41, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Stunning. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:06, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:21, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support----Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:37, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 18:12, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:33, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks, Cmao20, for the nomination! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- You’re very welcome. Cmao20 (talk) 12:10, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2025 at 19:12:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 19:12, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 19:12, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Support High quality image, captures an interesting subject very well Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Yes, a quality image, but no FP, mostly for 3 reasons: the item doesn't stand out from the background (walking futher to the right maybe could have helped, not sure), the bottom crop looks randomed (probably to avoid people) and the sculptures at the top are distorted due to the POV and applied perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- I checked the location and realized that the Bräunerstr gives you the oportunity to take a picture from much futher distance. If you use e.g. 200 mm from there you will benefit from 2 facts: distortion will be overall smaller because you are no standing below it and with higher mm the dof is also smaller, the background will be blury (which is what you need here). Just some thoughts. Poco a poco (talk) 06:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback. Maybe I'll try to reproduce the shot given your input, when I'm in Vienna next time :) FlocciNivis (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- I checked the location and realized that the Bräunerstr gives you the oportunity to take a picture from much futher distance. If you use e.g. 200 mm from there you will benefit from 2 facts: distortion will be overall smaller because you are no standing below it and with higher mm the dof is also smaller, the background will be blury (which is what you need here). Just some thoughts. Poco a poco (talk) 06:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The roof structure in the background is the most distracting element. The distortion can be easily corrected by stretching both sides. Ermell (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- For me this cyan roof structure was part of the subject/composition. It felt like a crown to the plague column. Maybe I should point that out more in the image description, but I can also see how other people might not find this composition pleasing. FlocciNivis (talk) 09:15, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per ermell. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Of course it would be nice to have a photo of the column with clear subject separation, but the idea behind this photo is different – as the description states, the “cyan structure on the roof […] seems to sit on top of the golden upper part of the column thanks to the perspective” –, and IMHO this makes an original and interesting composition. – Aristeas (talk) 17:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:04, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2025 at 12:36:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Roads#Poland
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:36, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:36, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Outstanding for its decentralized composition, which makes the image particularly interesting, along with its atmospheric lighting. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:04, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Extremely pleasant to look at, and a clear QI. However, the image appears to be downsampled, and I can't help but feel that the weight of the decentralized composition is on the less interesting side (i.e., greater emphasis on the fields rather than the new road to the viewer's left). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Nice light but the top of trees missing in the foreground make the content a bit empty in my view. (The verticals should be fixed but that's a minor issue) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:02, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Resolution is on the low side, but composition, mood, and light make up for it. Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Neutral It's a nice image and I really do love the composition, but the resolution is far too great for me to ignore. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:58, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Beautiful winter light and pleasant mood. – Aristeas (talk) 06:08, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2025 at 11:08:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Sweden
Info Cruising on Sveavägen, Stockholm (Sweden). Sweden has a, maybe, surprisingly vibrant car culture, with a strong emphasis on American vehicles. Sveavägen, once the city’s primary modern access road, played a central role in local car culture, hosting decades of car cruising. I recall growing up here in the 1980s, with memories of warm summer nights filled with the scents of gasoline, exhaust, and burnt rubber. Created, uploaded and nominated by ArildV (talk) 11:08, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 11:08, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A special car, somewhere? But sorry, the composition doesn't work for me. Perhaps the most interesting part of the image is cut out, at the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:52, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Unusual composition, but this really works for me. Excellent light and an almost cinematic evocation of an urban street cluttered with cars. Lots of interesting touches in the composition inclduing the geometric shapes of a reflected building in the roof of the car. This one isn't just a photograph, it's an artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not convinced by the compo overall (even if I appreciate details like Cmao20 mentions), sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:24, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Cmao20, such a cool photo. The XPan crop ratio really adds to the nostalgic mood! --Julesvernex2 (talk)
Oppose poor composition. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:59, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:26, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The composition isn't convincing. --Milseburg (talk) 09:36, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:28, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and Julesvernex2. – Aristeas (talk) 13:46, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2025 at 22:32:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Joao lara mesquita – nominated by MrNinja -- MrNinja (talk) 22:32, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Support A nice one. At the first glance it appears a bit dark, but I assume this is just realistic. I like the lush green all around, the mighty branch, the reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes - I agree this is not actually too dark, it's just in shadow. And what a lovely composition. Also verdant, rich greens. Cmao20 (talk) 13:42, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:00, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:23, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:05, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per anderen.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2025 at 17:53:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Mexico
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- ~~
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 17:53, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak support It's a shame the light is so very dull, but I do think this is pretty cool in terms of composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:41, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:47, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 22:03, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose not entirely satisfied with the lighting. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Poor light, sorry (and perspective problem) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:50, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose poor light, sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 09:39, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2025 at 01:20:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#United_Kingdom
Info: St. Mary's Church in Battersea, flanked by housing estates and bathed by the golden hour light, creating a surprisingly harmonious composition; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:20, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:20, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:30, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Knowing Battersea so very well (but not this view), I love the juxtaposition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:46, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 08:10, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:32, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The two houses are too blurry and the subject is not very unusual. Sorry.Ermell (talk) 13:24, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Ermell --Cvmontuy (talk) 17:57, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose for lack of sharpness. Wolverine X-eye 19:23, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Support It could be sharper, but I agree with Charles - the juxtaposition is so good. And the light is nice. It's not the kind of photo I feel too inclined to criticise for quality issues at full size because most of the effect is composition + light, not detail. Cmao20 (talk) 12:04, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, that's exactly why I nominated it. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:41, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:45, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:57, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:27, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2025 at 14:30:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info (c/u/n) -- Eshaangirri (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Eshaangirri (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2025 (UTC)- The quality of this portrait is lower than other FP portraits. Shallow DOF, too soft on the eyes. White balance needs correction (too yellow). Lots of chromatic aberrations. Because of all this, my vote is
Oppose. -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:47, 8 September 2025 (UTC) - Good portrait, but we should wait for VRT to process permission before promoting to FP. — Rhododendrites talk | 00:03, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
- Good point. Luckily we have the permission now [1]. – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak support IMHO this photo deserves a little love. The very low DoF is actually a feature; it makes the person stand out nicely from the background, this kind of interior portraits works only with shallow DoF. The bokeh is silky-soft and unobtrusive. Focus is on the eyelashes of the nearer = right eye, that’s fine. There are some minor CAs (hence my “weak” support), but all in all they are not irritating, and only very few 85mm F1.4 lenses will handle this better. – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Focus is not perfect, but resolution is very high so it is less important. Overall agree with Aristeas's review. Cmao20 (talk) 17:02, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree with Aristeas and Cmao20: the shallow depth of field is an asset here, giving the portrait strong subject-background separation. Despite minor flaws, the overall rendering and resolution justify FP status. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:38, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:33, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Shallow DoF, busy background --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:44, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The shallow DoF is a strong plus for me. But I can't accept the strong green fringes everywhere. --MB-one (talk) 19:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2025 at 04:49:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Aekingerzand Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Dead tree trunk beautifully situated in the clear water of a heathland ven. A soothing image for me.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:06, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:59, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 06:34, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, nothing to object but the item itself isn't extraordinary in my eyes Poco a poco (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Well-balanced composition. – Aristeas (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:30, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 20:45, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good photo but a bit too ordinary. --Ermell (talk) 22:22, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:53, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Ermell --Cvmontuy (talk) 18:12, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose with regret per Ermell. The technical quality of the image is excellent. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:13, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The water is blueish, and the composition not extraordinary, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:46, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:00, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Fri 12 Sep → Wed 17 Sep Sat 13 Sep → Thu 18 Sep Sun 14 Sep → Fri 19 Sep Mon 15 Sep → Sat 20 Sep Tue 16 Sep → Sun 21 Sep Wed 17 Sep → Mon 22 Sep
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Mon 08 Sep → Wed 17 Sep Tue 09 Sep → Thu 18 Sep Wed 10 Sep → Fri 19 Sep Thu 11 Sep → Sat 20 Sep Fri 12 Sep → Sun 21 Sep Sat 13 Sep → Mon 22 Sep Sun 14 Sep → Tue 23 Sep Mon 15 Sep → Wed 24 Sep Tue 16 Sep → Thu 25 Sep Wed 17 Sep → Fri 26 Sep
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
== Set Promoted to FP ==
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it by {{Assessments|featured=2}}.
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological list.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
