With marketing emails, perceptivity and interaction are two concepts that can be interchangeable. It’s not about sending more emails but about sharing the right message at the right time in a way that truly interests the recipient.

The Influence of Connection in Business B2B Email Marketing

Due to social media, some people might think B2B email marketing is out of style. But, 81% of marketers still prefer email marketing as their primary content distribution strategy (HubSpot). Why? Email is consistent. While social media posts are temporary, emails are forever until opened. Emails are read at the discretion of the receiver.

The focus should be on creating an atmosphere where a reply seems spontaneous, as opposed to hunting for replies.

Image Source

Crafting an Email List That Never Feels Intruded Upon

A well-organized list of email contacts is not just a series of names but should depict actual relationships. Communication should not be overly forced but rather voluntary, which is why buying email lists always fails. Shift focus to the following:

Offering Real Value

People appreciate efforts where they can gain knowledge or other significant items which is why people sign up to receive industry emails.

Removing Obstacles

Having the minimum required information as the only fields for sign-ups, which is usually a name and an email address, ensures that the process works for everyone.

Pre-engagement before the Ask

Inviting people through discussion forums, educational or promotional webinars, and industry conferences – then later asking for their emails fosters relationships organically.

Context Is Extremely Important

Generic emails often feel impersonal and irrelevant, which is why context matters.

Email segmentation isn’t just sorting people into groups—it’s understanding their needs and responding in a way that helps achieve the right results. Here are some criteria for segmentation:

Awareness of the Industry

A small agency has different challenges compared to a multinational company.

Sensitivity to Growth Stage

Problem-solving talk for a startup is very different from an established enterprise with defined systems.

Alignment to Buyer Journey

Hard selling only works on people who already know your brand well. People new to your brand need supportive information and suggestions that help guide them and give them direction through.

Gaining Attention the Right Way

People dismiss anything that seems too loud or too aggressive. A well-written subject line decides whether your email gets opened or not. The subject lines that work best are:

• Straightforward and to the Point – Staying under 50 characters makes it easier to view on mobile devices, which expands visibility.
• Warm and Familiar – “Hey [First Name], Thought You’d Find This Interesting” sounds human, unlike something generated by a machine.
• Honest – Don’t use urgency tactics that increase skepticism. Replace “LAST CHANCE!!!” with “A Simple Shift to Improve Your Response Rate.”

How Engagement Is Related to Rhythm

People have a routine, whether that is to check emails, focus on a particular task, or feel stressed. Email relaying should match these rhythms:

• For Maximum Engagement – The highest open rates for B2B emails are on Tuesdays at 10 AM (GetResponse, 2023).
• Balance Without Burnout – Sending 1-2 emails a week helps maintain a presence without causing weariness.
• Proactive Changes – Change if engagement is lower. Pay attention to monitored open rates and unsubscribes. Communication is flexible, not set in stone.

Encouraging Proactive Behavior within Guidelines

Inaction results from uncertainty about the next steps. Removing ambiguity and encouraging action can be done through Calls to Action (CTA). Examples of CTAs are:

• Download the Free Report Today
• Schedule a Demo for 15 Minutes
• Join Our Expert Webinar Now

The secret? One CTA in a single email. An abundance of possibilities results in inaction. On the other hand, a single clear action stimulates action.

Personalized Automated Messaging Versus Cold Automation

A connection with the audience can be maintained through automation. Automation that is personalized increases conversion by 320%, according to Forrester (2023). This is only achievable with a human touch. The following defines such touch:

• Emails that Confirm Registration – The first email should deliver the insights praised and promised.
• Campaign Email Sequences – Gradual emails inspire contemplation and allow recipients to respond as they wish.
• Subtle Engagement Reminder – Reengagement is subtle, questioning if someone wishes to return while respecting boundaries. This addresses lost interest by kindly inviting individuals back. An example of this is, “We Miss You, [Name]—Still Interested?”

Avoiding Spam: Staying in the Zone of Trust

Image Source

Too frequent, impersonal, and aggressive emails will set off resistance. Skipping over this  trusted zone can be done by:

Verifying Emails (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) – These systems confirm your status as a sender to email providers.

• List Cleaning – Regularly removing unengaged contacts maintains overall list health.
• Mind Engagement Patterns – Email frequency should correlate with engagement patterns.

Tracking Meaningful Engagement

Specific metrics narrate a larger story for an email campaign. If a campaign falls flat, something is failing to resonate.

• Open Rate: 21.33% (average)
• Click-Through Rate: 2.62% (good)
• Conversion Rate: 1-5% (varies)
• Bounce Rate: < 2% (ideal)
• Unsubscribe Rate: < 0.5% (healthy)

Key Takeaways

In B2B email marketing, building relationships matters more than just tracking numbers. It’s about connecting with the right person at the right time and sharing a thoughtful message.

Thoughtful, relevant campaigns create real progress, not just passive responses. Sales naturally follow when you build strong customer relationships.

The price tag is mainly what’s raising eyebrows and prompting potential customers to ask, “How am I saving money on this?” Especially since Philips is already marketing lower-priced, though less efficient, LED lighting as well as other companies. Well, aside from the fact that it is the first winner (and intriguingly, the only entrant) of the U.S. Department of Energy sponsored $10 million L Prize, Philips’ bulb also presents a significant energy savings advantage.

The Philips bulb is described as the “most energy efficient yet,” in compliance with the contest’s demanding requirements. The L Prize, also known as the Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prize, was intended to challenge lighting manufacturers to modernize the energy-hungry common light bulb into highly developed, highly efficient, and solid-state lighting products. The L Prize targeted in particular the replacement of the 60-watt incandescent light bulb and the PAR 38 halogen incandescent bulb. The requirements for replacing the 60w bulb include using less than 10 watts, producing more than 900 lumens, and having a 25,000 hour life among other conditions. A summary of the requirements for the replacement of both bulbs may be seen here.

Philips’ bulb won the contest in August last year, with its bulb using less than 10 watts while producing an equal amount of light as a 60w bulb, translating to an estimated 83% savings in energy. The bulb is said to last for up to 30,000 hours, thirty times more than the incandescent light bulb it replaced. If used for four hours a day, it is expected to last for about 20 years. Philips’ bulb also underwent a series of tests including photometric performance, field tests, stress tests, and long term light test. Photometric performance test measured electrical characteristics and light output. Field tests evaluated energy efficiency, reliability, and customer acceptance. Stress tests measured the product’s resistance to shock, humidity, friction, and high/low temperatures. Long term light tests aim to measure how long the product will be able to give quality light output and performance over time.

Despite the Philips’ bulb’s performance, the price is still holding back many potential buyers. Web users’ comments are divided between pouncing on a lighting product that will save energy for 20 years and expressing doubt whether investing $60 to find out if it lasts that long is a wise decision.

Furthermore, the L Prize required that the winning light bulb be sold for only $22 on the first year, which is only about a third of the Philips’ $60 price tag. Therefore Philips is giving discounts which could lower the price to $50, and seeking deals with electric utilities to bring it down to $20-$30. Yahoo Finance reports that the head of Philips’ U.S.lighting division, Ed Crawford, stated that utility rebates were part of the plan to lower the price to the L Prize requirement.

Whether Philips’ prizewinning light bulb will brighten Earth Day this month remains to be seen. Considering that LEDs sold for $200 per unit until 1968, will the public see the state-of-the-art Philips bulb as a steal, a splurge, or a wise investment?

Photo Credit: Some rights reserved by spacepleb on Flickr.